Player not loading? Watch on YouTube
This Russian-language tutorial is summarized in English from its complete English caption track.
This tutorial follows Qwen Code setup in VS Code, then compares Qwen 3.7 Max with Claude Code using Opus 4.7. The demonstrated coding assistant connects to a paid Alibaba Cloud service through an API key. The walkthrough does not demonstrate local model inference.
The setup covers Google registration, region selection, card verification and a Token Plan subscription. The presenter advises choosing a region that matches the phone number because the verification form fixes the country prefix. He demonstrates a $1 card check and selects a $30 plan, with $6.60 tax shown at checkout. These are recording-specific amounts; the claimed equivalence to Claude's $100 subscription is not established by the test.
After generating an API token, he installs the VS Code extension. His working authorization sequence selects the Token Plan option, inserts the key, skips the initial model entry and then switches to model 3.7. Other authorization choices fail in his attempt. He also notes that Qwen lacks a desktop shell comparable to Claude Code's at the time of recording.
Both tools receive the same request for an interactive 3D landing page with a product configurator. The presenter checks diamond rendering, color and shape controls, and other page behavior. He praises Qwen's result but points out visual flaws and nonworking contacts during the comparison. This is one design task and a subjective assessment, rather than evidence of general model parity.
