Mastra vs LangChain vs AI SDK vs LangGraph: choosing

Compare four TypeScript agent frameworks, learn when checkpointing matters, and see why the speaker says their cloud services are optional.

Player not loading? Watch on YouTube

This comparison examines Mastra, AI SDK, LangChain and LangGraph for TypeScript developers choosing an AI agent framework. The speaker groups them into two related pairs: Mastra uses parts of AI SDK, while LangChain's agent loop builds on LangGraph.

AI SDK provides a common interface for generating and streaming text across model providers. The speaker recommends it or LangChain for simple agents and classifiers with little surrounding infrastructure. LangChain adds an agent loop and middleware for tasks such as redacting sensitive information or involving a human.

Mastra bundles memory, RAG, workflows and tracing, plus a developer server for testing agents and inspecting workflow steps. LangGraph asks developers to define nodes, edges and state explicitly. Its checkpointing supports resuming interrupted work. The speaker says Mastra also supports durability through its workflow API and durable agents, so the choice depends on how much infrastructure and graph control a project needs.

Deployment can be self-hosted, according to the presentation. The speaker describes cloud services as optional and discusses checkpoint storage on your own server. This is a framework comparison, rather than a demonstration of local model inference. The closing advice weighs maintenance and documentation; the speaker's preference for the Mastra and AI SDK communities comes with an admission of limited experience with the other two.